BIOLOGY CLASS XI & XII











GLOSSARY OF WORDS

CHAPTER : 10

BIOLOGY

MICROBES IN HUMAN WELFARE

MICROBES: Organisms which are too small to be seen with naked eyes.

 

INOCULUM: Cells added to start bacterial culture. Or Biological material injected in human to induce or increase immunity to a disease.

 

BEVERAGE: A drink other than water.

 

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE: A drink containing alcohol.

 

FERMENTATION: The chemical breakdown of a substance by bacteria or yeast or any other microorganisms, typically involving effervescence & giving off of heat. The process involved in alcoholic beverage formation.

 

ANTIBIOTICS: Substances which are used to kill or suppress the growth of other disease causing microbes.

 

BROAD SPECTRUM ANTIBIOTIC: Antibiotics effective against wide range of bacteria or microbes.

 

BACILLUS: Rod like in shape.

 

COCCUS: Spherical in shape.

ENZYME: Enzyme is a substance which act as catalyst in living organisms, regulating the  rate of reaction without being used up or consumed.

 

CHEESE: A food made from pressed curds of milk, firm and elastic or soft and semiliquid in texture.

 

TODDY: Fresh or fermented sap of palm used as drink.

 

IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE: A substance which suppresses the immune system.

 

CLOTBLUSTER: A drug such as streptokinase used to dissolve the clot.

 

ORGANIC ACIDS: Acids of plant or animal origin like citric acid etc.

 

SEWAGE: Waste water.

 

FLOCS: Masses of bacteria associated with fungal filament to form a mesh like structure called flocs. Flocs are in mud composition.

 

METHANOGEN: Collective name for the bacteria which act on cellulose to produce Methane gas along with COand H2.

 

BIOFERTILIZERS: Biofertilizers are substances used enrich the nutrient quality of soil.

MYCORRHIZA   :   Mycorrhiza is fungal symbiotic association with plants which help in enriching the nutrient content of soil.

 

Bt-TOXIN: A crystalline poisonous substance released by Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria which kills the insects.

Following is the link of video on Microbes In Human Welfare

https://youtu.be/jz4z6lw6YKM

https://youtu.be/jz4z6lw6YKM

video on MICROBES IN HUMAN WELFARE



 

 










Following are the 11 links for PPT of UNIT -II, Class XII Biology:-

INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE 

LINKAGE AND CROSSING OVER

DNA REPLICATION

DNA STRUCTURE

MICROBES IN HUMAN WELFARE

TRANSCRIPTION

PRINCIPLES OF INHERITANCE (1).pptx

Evidence_of_Evolution (1).pptx

Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium.pptx

HOMOLOGOUS AND ANALOGOUS ORGANS^.pptx

ORIGIN OF LIFE.pptx

THEORIES OF ORIGIN OF LIFE.pptx


Following is the notes of PRINCIPLES OF INHERITANCE , BIOLOGY, CLASS XII


BASICS OF BIOLOGY

BY- G. K. SINGH

PGT (BIOLOGY)

UNIT- VI

CLASS: XII

CHAPTER-5

PRINCIPLES OF INHERITANCE AND VARIATION

G.J.Mendel is known as father of genetics.

Mendel was born on 22nd July 1822.

He died in 1884 till his death his work remain urecognised.

Later 16 years after his death his work was recognised  by Hugo De Vres , Correns and Tscermak.

Q.Mendel’s work was unrecognized for long period because:

i)                   Because it could not be published in any international general.

ii)                 Because biologist did not accept his work.

iii)              Factors which according to Mendel were responsible for inheritance of character from next generation to next was not understood how they can pass.

Q.WHY DID MENDEL SELECTED PEA PLANT FOR HIS STUDIES OF INHERITANCE?

Mendel Selected pea palnt (Pisum sativum) for his studies of inheritance.

Because:

i)Pea plant has short life cycle.

ii)They have 7 pairs of physically distinct contrasting  character.

iii)They were easy to grow.

iv)They can be both self as well as cross pollinated.

v)Pea seeds do not show dormancy.

vi)Pea plants produce large number of seeds.

 

Q.WHY WAS MENDEL SUCCESSFUL IN HIS WORK:

i)                   Selection of pea plant which has seven pairs of contrasting characters.

ii)                 Pea plant produce large no. of seeds so he got large sample size for his studies.

iii)              Pea plant has short life span so he could study many generation.

iv)               He analysed the data properly mathematically as he was a mathematician.

v)                 No gene of pea plant were linked.

Q.. WHAT WERE THE SEVEN PAIRS OF CONTRASTING CHARACTERS IN PES?

Seven pairs of contrasting characters in pea are:

CHARACTER                            DOMINANT                            RECESSIVE

i)Plant Height                                   Tall                                      Dwarf

ii)Flower Position                        Axial                                        Terminal.

iii)Flower colour                            Purple                                     White 

iv)Pod shape                                   Inflated                                  Constricted

 

v)Pod colour                                 Green                                      Yellow

vi)Seed shape                                Round                                     Wrinkled

vii)Seed colour                               Yellow                                     Green.

 

GENE the term Gene was given by Johannsen.

Gene is the functional unit of inheritance.

Genes were called Factor by the Mendel.

Alleles:

 Alleles are the factors which code for a pair of contrasting character.

Alleles have two forms:

i)                   DOMINANT: The form which expresses in Heterozygous condition. Dominant allele is always written in capital letter.

ii)                 RECESSIVET: The form which can not express in heterozygous condition. Recessive allele is always written in small letter.

 

Homozygous:

 If both the alleles of a character are of the same type.

Eg.  (TT) dominant or (tt) Recessive.

 

Heterozygous:

 If both the alleles of a character are of different types.

Eg. (Tt)

 

Phenotype:

 Externally visible character.

Eg. Tall or dwarf.

 

Genotype:

 Genetic makeup of an organism.

Eg. Homozygous or Heterozygous /dominant or recessive

I,e. (Tt) , (TT), (tt)

 

 

Monohybrid cross:

 Cross for only one pair of contrasting character .

Eg.Plant height (short or Tall),seed colour or seed shape etc.

 

   T T            x              t t

 

T        T                    t             t                in F1 PR = GR = 4:0

 

 


Tt      Tt                   Tt                Tt------ F-1 all tall , all Heterozygous.

 

On SELFING THE F-1 INDIVIDUALS

         

                       Tt                x             Tt

 

               T               t                  T                t

 

 


      TT               Tt                  Tt                            tt                  F2

 

In F2 Phenotype is 3 tall and one dwarf but

Genotype is 1 Homozygous tall(TT), 2 Heterozygous tall (Tt) and 1 Recessive(tt)

In

   F2       PR = 3:1

 

   F2       GR = 1:2:1

 

In monohybrid number of gametes produced = 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Dihybrid cross:

 Cross for two pairs of contrasting characters.

Eg. Seed colour and seed shape together.

  

      Tall palnt with Axial flower               Dwarf plant with terminal flower

                          TTAA                           X                        ttaa

 

 

              TA   (4 Gamete)                                        ta ( all 4 gamete)

 

 

                                                

             F1                                    TtAa ( all 16 F1 plants Heterozygous, tall and axial )

  

F1      PR = GR = 16:0

  

       ON SELFING F1 GENERATION

                 

                   TtAa                   X         TtAa

 

Four gametes formed are TA, Ta, tA, ta

 

TA

Ta

tA

ta

TA

TTAA

TTAa

TtAA

TtAa

Ta

TTAa

TTaa

TtAa

Ttaa

tA

TtAA

TtAa

ttAA

ttAa

ta

TtAa

Ttaa

ttAa

ttaa

 

         Tall & Axial = 9

  Tall & Terminal = 3

 Dwarf and Axial = 3  

 

 

  Dwarf and Terminal = 1

So in F2 of dihybrid cross PR= 9:3:3:1

 

F2 of dihybrid cross Gr=1:2:1:2:4:2:1:2:1

  

Trihybrid Cross:

 TTAAPP       X       ttaapp

 

Dominant Character:

 The character which is expressed in heterozygous condition is called Dominant character. or the character which expresses in F1 generation of a monohybrid cross.

 

Recessive Character:

 The character which is not expressed in heterozygous condition. Or the character which fails to express itself in F1 generation of a monohybrid cross.

 

FILIAL: Generation

 

SELFING:CROSSING TWO INDIVIDUALS OF THE SAME GENERATION

 

Phenotypic ratio of F2 generation of a monohybrid cross is 3:1(Tall:dwarf)

 

Genotypic ratio of F2 Generation of a monohybrid cross is 1:2:1

(Homozygous tall: Heterozygous tall: Dwarf )

 

Test Cross:

The cross of any individual with homozygous recessive individual for the trait is known as test cross .

Test cross helps us to know whether an individual is homozygous or heterozygous for the trait.

If the result of test cross is all dominant character than the individual must be Homozygous for the trait but if the result is 50% dominant and 50% recessive it must be Heterozygous..

 

Back Cross:

 Crossing any F1 individual with any one of the parent is called back cross.

Back cross is done to for breed improvement in both plants and animals.

 

ON THE BASIS OF MONOHYBRID CROSS MENDEL GAVE TWO LAWS OF INHERITANCE:

I)LAW OF DOMINANCE.

II)LAW OF SEGREGATION .

Law of Dominance and Law of segregation can be explained by both Monohybrid as well as Dihybrid corss

 

ON THE BASIS OF DIHYBRID CROSS MENDEL GAVE

I)LAW OF INDEPENDENT ASSORTMENT.

Law of Independent assortment can only be explained by Dihybrid cross.

1 INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE

 When experiments on peas were repeated sometimes the F1 had a phenotype that did not resemble either of the two parents and was in between the two. The inheritance of flower colour in the dog flower (snapdragon or Antirrhinum sp.) is a good example to understand incomplete dominance. In a cross between true-breeding red-flowered (RR) and truebreeding white-flowered plants (rr), the F1 (Rr) was pink . When the F1 was self-pollinated the F2 resulted in the following ratio 1 (RR) Red: 2 (Rr) Pink: 1 (rr) White. Here the genotype ratios were exactly as we would expect in any mendelian monohybrid cross, but the phenotype ratios had changed from the 3:1 dominant : recessive ratio. What happened was that R was not completely dominant over r and this made it possible to distinguish Rr as pink from RR (red) and rr (white) .

 

INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE:

 Inheritance of flower colour in Dog flower (snap dragon or antirrhinum) shows beautiful example of incomplete dominance. When red coloured (RR) Flower were crossed with white (rr) coloured flowersthe F1 progenys were all Pink (Rr) but

F2 progenys were

1 red (RR) :2 Pink (Rr) :1 white (rr)

 

In the F1 progeny none of the alleles were fully dominant or able to suppress the other and an intermediate pink colour appeared.

 

2. CO-DOMINANCE

 in the case of co-dominance the F1 generation resembles both parents. A good example is different types of red blood cells that determine ABO blood grouping in human beings.

 ABO blood groups are controlled by the gene I. The plasma membrane of the red blood cells has sugar polymers that protrude from its surface and the kind of sugar is controlled by the gene. The gene (I) has three alleles I A , I B and i. The alleles I A and I B produce a slightly different form of the sugar while allele i does not produce any sugar. Because humans are diploid organisms, each person possesses any two of the three I gene alleles. I A and I B are completely dominant over i, in other words when I A and i are present only I A expresses (because i does not produce any sugar), and when I B and i are present I B expresses. But when I A and I B are present together they both express their own types of sugars: this is because of co-dominance. Hence red blood cells have both A and B types of sugars.

 

 Since there are three different alleles, there are six different combinations of these three alleles that are possible, and therefore, a total of six different genotypes of the human ABO blood types .

MULTIPLE ALLELISM

-We realise that the example of ABO blood grouping also provides a good example of multiple alleles? Here you can see that there are more than two, i.e., three alleles, governing the same character. Since in an individual only two alleles can be present, multiple alleles can be found only when population studies are made.

 

 

ATAVISM:

If an ancestral trait reappears after having being disappeared or lost in few earlier generation the phenomenon is called Atavism.

 

CHROMOSOMAL THEORY OF INHERITANCE :

Chromosomal Theory Of Inheritance was an extension of MENDEL’S laws and it was proposed by Walter Sutton and Theodore Boveri.

In 1865 Mendels work was published but remain unrecognized .

 

Mendels Theory

Sutton and Boveri

1

 

Factors are in pairs                              .

 

chromosomes which have these genes are also in

homologouspairs

2

 

 Factors separate at the time

Of gamete formation

Chromosomes of homologous pair separate during gamete

Formation

3

 

These factors or alleles assort

Independently.

Chromosomes also assort independently.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                 

T. H. Morgan gave the experimental proof of the chromosomal theory of inheritance.

Morgan worked with the tiny fruit fly Drosophila Melanogaster.  

                                                                                               

LINKAGE:

Physical association of genes on a chromosome.Closer the genes on a chromosome the more they will be linked i,e. the less will be the chances of their recombination or separation.

Recombination frequency is more if the genes located away from each other.

LINKAGE AND RECOMBINATION

Morgan carried out several dihybrid crosses in Drosophila to study genes that were sex-linked.  When Morgan hybridised yellow-bodied, white-eyed females to brown-bodied, red-eyed males and intercrossed their F1 progeny. He observed that the two genes did not segregate independently of each other and the F2 ratio deviated very significantly from the 9:3:3:1 ratio .

Morgan and his group knew that the genes were located on the X chromosome  and saw quickly that when the two genes in a dihybrid cross were situated on the same chromosome, the proportion of parental gene combinations were much higher than the non-parental type. Morgan attributed this due to the physical association or linkage of the two genes. and coined

The term linkage to describe this physical association of genes on a chromosome and the term recombination to describe the generation of non-parental gene combinations .

 Morgan and his group also found that even when genes were grouped on the same chromosome, some genes were very tightly linked (showed very low recombination)  while others were loosely linked (showed higher recombination) .

 For example he found that the genes white and yellow were very tightly linked and showed only 1.3 per cent recombination while white and miniature wing showed 37.2 per cent recombination.

Mendel’s student Alfred Sturtevant used the frequency of recombination between gene pairs on the same chromosome as a measure of the distance between genes and ‘mapped’ their position on the chromosome.

 

COMPLETE LINKAGE :

If the genes are located very close to each other they are said to be completely linked and chances of recombination is less. Complete linked genes are so close that there is no chance of their separation because crossing over is not possible.

 

INCOMPLETE LINKAGE:

 If the genes which are not so close they may get separated in next generation they are supposed to be incompletely linked.

SIGNIFICANCE OF LINKED GENES IS THAT THEY ARE USED AS MARKERS.

Linkage group is same as no of chromosomes in one set.

In human the no. of chromosomes is n=23 so there are 23 linkage groups.

In Drosophila n=4 so linkage group is 4

 

GENE MAPPING:

 

Recombination Frequency:

 Recombination frequency is directly proportional to map unit.

Map Unit:

 If gene A and B are 10 map unit apart than crossing over frequency will be 10%.

Polygenic traits:

  If a character is controlled by three or more genes iit is known as Polygenic traits .

 e.g .Human skin colour . The effect of each allele is additive.

PLEIOTROPY

 Occasionally, a single gene product may produce more than one effect.

 

 For example, starch synthesis in pea seeds is controlled by one gene. It has two alleles (B and b).

 

 Dominance is not an autonomous feature of a gene or the product that it has information for. It depends as much on the gene product and the production of a particular phenotype from this product as it does on the particular phenotype that we choose to examine, in case more than one phenotype is influenced by the same gene.

 

 

 

 

PLEIOTROPY :

 The phenomenon in which a single gene exhibit more than one phenotypic expression .

e.g .Disease Phenylketonuria.

 

SEX DETERMINATION:

 

Human beings have 22pair of autosomes and 1(23rd pair) pair of sex chromosomes.XX is female And XY is male. So males are Heterogamety.

 

 IN BIRDS

   ZZ is male and ZW is female. So females are heterogamety.

 

SEX DETERMINATION IN HONEY BEES.

In honey bees sex determination is based on the number of sets of chromosomes.

An individual developed from fertilized egg is female (queen or worker) are diploid 2n=32

An individual developed from an unfertilized egg by parthenogenesis is male with haploid n=16 chromosomes.

 

 POLYGENIC INHERITANCE

 Mendel’s studies mainly described those traits that have distinct alternate forms such as flower colour which are either purple or white. But if you look around you will find that there are many traits which are not so distinct in their occurrence and are spread across a gradient.

  Example, in humans we don’t just have tall or short people as two distinct alternatives but a whole range of possible heights. Such traits are generally controlled by three or more genes and are thus called as polygenic traits. Besides the involvement of multiple genes polygenic inheritance also takes into account the influence of environment. Human skin colour is another classic example for this.

In a polygenic trait the phenotype reflects the contribution of each allele, i.e., the effect of each allele is additive.

 To understand this better let us assume that three genes A, B, C control skin colour in human with the dominant forms A, B and C responsible for dark skin colour and the recessive forms a, b and c for light skin colour. The genotype with all the dominant alleles (AABBCC) will have the darkest skin colour and that with all the recessive alleles (aabbcc) will have the lightest skin colour.

As expected the genotype with three dominant alleles and three recessive alleles will have an intermediate skin colour. In this manner the number of each type of alleles in the genotype would determine the darkness or lightness of the skin in an individual.

 PLEIOTROPY

A single gene can exhibit multiple phenotypic expression. Such a gene is called a pleiotropic gene and the phenomenon is called Pleiotropy.

 The underlying mechanism of pleiotropy in most cases is the effect of a gene on metabolic pathways which contribute towards I phenotypes.

 An example of this is the disease phenylketonuria, which occurs in humans. The disease is caused by mutation in the gene that codes for the enzyme phenyl alanine hydroxylase (single gene mutation). This manifests itself through phenotypic expression characterised by mental retardation and a reduction in hair and skin pigmentation.

 

                                                        

 MENDELIAN DISORDERS

 Broadly, genetic disorders may be grouped into two categories –

(1)Mendelian disorders and

(2) Chromosomal disorders.

 Mendelian disorders are mainly determined by alteration or mutation in the single gene. These disorders are transmitted to the offspring on the same lines as we have studied in the principle of inheritance. The pattern of inheritance of such Mendelian disorders can be traced in a family by the pedigree analysis.

 Most common and prevalent Mendelian disorders are Haemophilia, Cystic fibrosis, Sicklecell anaemia, Colour blindness, Phenylketonuria, Thalassemia, etc.

 These Mndelian disorders may be dominant or recessive.

By pedigree analysis one can easily understand whether the trait in question is dominant or recessive. Similarly, the trait may also be linked to the sex chromosome as in case of haemophilia. It is evident that this X-linked recessive trait shows transmission from carrier female to male progeny

COLOUR BLINDNESS :

 It is a sex-linked recessive disorder due to defect in either red or green cone of eye resulting in failure to discriminate between red and green colour. This defect is due to mutation in certain genes present in the X chromosome. It occurs in about 8 per cent of males and only about 0.4 per cent of females. This is because the genes that lead to red-green colour blindness are on the X chromosome. Males have only one X chromosome and females have two. The son of a woman who carries

 

the gene has a 50 per cent chance of being colour blind. The mother is not herself colour blind because the gene is recessive. That means that its effect is suppressed by her matching dominant normal gene.

 A daughter will not normally be colour blind, unless her mother is a carrier and her father is colour blind.

 

HAEMOPHILIA :

This sex linked recessive disease, which shows its transmission from unaffected carrier female to some of the male progeny has been widely studied. In this disease, a single protein that is a part of the cascade of proteins involved in the clotting of blood is affected. Due to this, in an affected individual a simple cut will result in non-stop bleeding.

 The heterozygous female (carrier) for haemophilia may transmit the disease to sons.

 The possibility of a female becoming a haemophilic is extremely rare because mother of such a female has to be at least carrier and the father should be haemophilic (unviable in the later stage of life).

The family pedigree of Queen Victoria shows a number of haemophilic descendents as she was a carrier of the disease.

 

SICKLE-CELL ANAEMIA :

 This is an autosome linked recessive trait that can be transmitted from parents to the offspring when both the partners are carrier for the gene (or heterozygous).

 

The disease is controlled by a single pair of allele, HbA and HbS . Out of the three possible genotypes only homozygous individuals for HbS (HbSHbS ) show the diseased phenotype.

Heterozygous (HbAHbS ) individuals appear apparently unaffected but they are carrier of the disease as there is 50 per cent probability of transmission of the mutant gene to the progeny, thus exhibiting sickle-cell trait .

 

The defect is caused by the substitution of Glutamic acid by Valine At 6th position of β chain of haemoglobin.

CHROMOSOMAL DISORDERS

The chromosomal disorders on the other hand are caused due to absence or excess or abnormal arrangement of one or more chromosomes. Failure of segregation of chromatids during cell division cycle results in the gain or loss of a chromosome(s), called aneuploidy.

 For example, Down’s syndrome results in the gain of extra copy of chromosome 21.

  Turner’s syndrome results due to loss of an X chromosome in human females.

 

POLYPLOIDY

 Failure of cytokinesis after telophase stage of cell division results in an increase in a whole set of chromosomes in an organism and, this phenomenon is known as polyploidy. This condition is often seen in plants.

The total number of chromosomes in a normal human cell is 46 (23 pairs). Out of these 22 pairs are autosomes and one pair of chromosomes are sex chromosome.

 

TRISOMY AND MONOSOMY

Sometimes, though rarely, either an additional copy of a chromosome may be included in an individual or an individual may lack one of any one pair of chromosomes. These situations are known as trisomy or monosomy of a chromosome, respectively.

 Such a situation leads to very serious consequences in the individual.

 Down’s syndrome, Turner’s syndrome, Klinefelter’s syndrome are common examples of chromosomal disorders.

 

 DOWN’S SYNDROME :

The cause of this genetic disorder is the presence of an additional copy of the chromosome number 21 (trisomy of 21). This disorder was first described by Langdon Down (1866).

 

EFFECTS OF DOWN’S SYNDROME

 The affected individual is short statured with small round head, furrowed tongue and partially open mouth. Palm is broad with characteristic palm crease. Physical, psychomotor and mental development is retarded.

 

KLINEFELTER’S SYNDROME :

This genetic disorder is also caused due to the presence of an additional copy of Xchromosome resulting into a karyotype of 47, XXY. Such an individual has overall masculine development, however, the feminine development (development of breast, i.e., Gynaecomastia) is also expressed (Figure 5.17 a). Such individuals are sterile.

 

 TURNER’S SYNDROME :

Such a disorder is caused due to the absence of one of the X chromosomes, i.e., 45 with X0, Such females are sterile as ovaries are rudimentary besides other features including lack of other secondary sexual characters .

CHAPTER 7

EVOLUTION

ORIGIN OF LIFE

Stellar distances are measured in light years. What we see today is an object whose emitted light started its journey millions of year back and from trillions of kilometres away and reaching our eyes now. However, when we see objects in our immediate surroundings we see them instantly and hence in the present time.

UNIVERSE

The origin of life is considered a unique event in the history of universe. The universe is vast. The universe is very old – almost 20 billion years old. Huge clusters of galaxies comprise the universe. Galaxies contain stars and clouds of gas and dust. Considering the size of universe, earth is indeed a speck.

THE BIG BANG THEORY

 The Big Bang theory attempts to explain the origin of universe. It talks of a singular huge explosion unimaginable in physical terms. The universe expanded and hence, the temperature came down. Hydrogen and Helium formed sometime later. The gases condensed under gravitation and formed the galaxies of the present day universe.

 In the solar system of the milky way galaxy, earth was supposed to have been formed about 4.5 billion years back. There was no atmosphere on early earth. Water vapour, methane, carbondioxide and ammonia released from molten mass covered the surface. The UV rays from the sun broke up water into Hydrogen and Oxygen and the lighter H2 escaped. Oxygen combined with ammonia and methane to form water, CO2 and others. The ozone layer was formed. As it cooled, the water vapor fell as rain, to fill all the depressions and form oceans. Life appeared 500 million years after the formation of earth, i.e., almost four billion years back.

 DID LIFE COME FROM OUTERSPACE?

THEORIES OF ORIGIN OF LIFE

(1)THEORY OF PANSPERMIA

(1)Some scientists believe that it came from outside. Early Greek thinkers thought units of life called spores were transferred to different planets including earth. ‘Panspermia’ is still a favourite idea for some astronomers.

(2)THEORY OF SPONTANEOUS GENERATION.

(2)it was also believed that life came out of decaying and rotting matter like straw, mud, etc. This was the theory of spontaneous generation.

(3)THEORY OF BIOGENESIS

(3)Louis Pasteur by careful experimentation demonstrated that life comes only from pre-existing life. He showed that in pre-sterilised flasks, life did not come from killed yeast while in another flask open to air, new living organisms arose from ‘killed yeast’. Spontaneous generation theory was dismissed once and for all.

 

(4) THEORY OF CHEMICAL EVOLUTIONOF LIFE

 Oparin of Russia and Haldane of England proposed that the first form of life could have come from pre-existing non-living organic molecules (e.g. RNA, protein, etc.) and that formation of life was preceded by chemical evolution, i.e., formation of diverse organic molecules from inorganic constituents. The conditions on earth were – high temperature, volcanic storms, reducing atmosphere containing CH4 , NH3 , etc.

 S.L. MILLER’S EXPERIMENT FOR CHEMICAL ORIGIN OF LIFE

In 1953, S.L. Miller, an American scientist created similar conditions in a laboratory scale (Figure 7.1). He created electric discharge in a closed flask containing CH4 , H2 , NH3 and water vapour at 8000C. He observed formation of amino acids. In similar experiments others observed, formation of sugars, nitrogen bases, pigment and fats. Analysis of meteorite content also revealed similar compounds indicating that similar processes are occurring elsewhere in space. With this limited evidence, the first part of the conjectured story, i.e., chemical evolution was more or less accepted. The first non-cellular forms of life could have originated 3 billion years back. They would have been giant molecules (RNA, Protein

 

 

Polysaccharides, etc.). These capsules reproduced their molecules perhaps. The first cellular form of life did not possibly originate till about 2000 million years ago. These were probably single-cells. All life forms were in water environment only. This version of a biogenesis, i.e., the first form of life arose slowly through evolutionary forces from non-living molecules is accepted by majority.

 

 EVOLUTION OF LIFE FORMS – A THEORY

(5) THE THEORY OF SPECIAL CREATION.

 Conventional religious literature tells us about the theory of special creation. This theory has three connotations. One, that

 (1) That all living organisms (species or types) that we see today were created as such by the supreme power God

(2)  That the diversity was always the same since creation and will be the same in future also.

(3)  That earth is about 4000 years old.

 All these ideas were strongly challenged during the nineteenth century. Based on observations made during a sea voyage in a sail ship called H.M.S. Beagle round the world, Charles Darwin concluded that existing living forms share similarities to varying degrees not only among themselves but also with life forms that existed millions of years ago.

There has been gradual evolution of life forms. Any population has built in variation in characteristics. Those characteristics which enable some to survive better in natural conditions (climate, food, physical factors, etc.) would outbreed others that are less-endowed to survive under such natural conditions. Another word used is fitness of the individual or population. The fitness, according to Darwin, refers ultimately and only to reproductive fitness.

THEORY OF NATURAL SELECTION

Hence, those who are better fit in an environment, leave more progeny than others. These, therefore, will survive more and hence are selected by nature. He called it natural selection and implied it as a mechanism of evolution. Let us also remember that Alfred Wallace, a naturalist who worked in Malay Archipelago had also come to similar conclusions around the same time. In due course of time, apparently new types of organisms are recognisable periods in the history of earth (epochs, periods and eras). The geological history of earth closely correlates with the biological history of earth. A common permissible conclusion is that earth is very old, not thousand of years as was thought earlier but billions of years old.

 WHAT ARE THE EVIDENCES FOR EVOLUTION?

 Evidence that evolution of life forms has indeed taken place on earth has come from many quarters.

PALEONTOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

 Fossils are remains of hard parts of life-forms found in rocks. Rocks form sediments and a cross-section of earth's crust indicates the arrangement of sediments one over the other during the long history of earth. Different-aged rock sediments contain fossils of different life-forms who probably died during the formation of the particular sediment. A study of fossils in different sedimentary layers indicates the geological period in which they existed. The study showed that life-forms varied over time and certain life forms are restricted to certain geological timespans. Hence, new forms of life have arisen at different times in the history of earth. All this is called paleontological evidence.

EMBRYOLOGICAL EVIDENCES FOR EVOLUTION

Embryological support for evolution was also proposed by Ernst Heckel based upon the observation of certain features during embryonic stage common to all vertebrates that are absent in adult. For example, the embryos of all vertebrates including human develop a row of vestigial gill slit just behind the head but it is a functional organ only in fish and not found in any other adult vertebrates.

 However, this o proposal was disapproved on careful study performed by Karl Ernst von Baer. He noted that embryos never pass through the adult stages of other animals.

ANATOMICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVIDENCES.

TEY ARE OF FOLLOWING TYPES

1.   Homologous organs.

2.   Analogous organs.

3.   Vestigeal Organs

HOMOLOGOUS ORGANS AND DIVERGENT EVOLUTION

Whales, bats, Cheetah and human (all mammals) share similarities in the pattern of bones of forelimbs . Though these forelimbs perform different functions in these animals, they have similar anatomical structure – all of them have humerus, radius, ulna, carpals, metacarpals and phalanges in their forelimbs. Hence, in these animals, the same structure developed along different directions due to adaptations to different needs. This is divergent evolution and these structures are homologous. Homology indicates common ancestry. Other examples are vertebrate hearts or brains. In plants also, the thorn and tendrils of Bougainvillea and Cucurbita represent homology (Figure 7.3a). Homology is based on divergent evolution whereas analogy refers to a situation exactly opposite.

ANALOGOUS ORGANS AND CONVERGENT EVOLUTION

 Wings of butterfly and of birds look alike. They are not anatomically similar structures though they perform similar functions. Hence, analogous structures are a result of convergent evolution - different structures evolving for the same function and hence having similarity. Other examples of analogy are the eye of the octopus and of mammals or the flippers of Penguins and Dolphins. One can say that it is the similar habitat that has resulted in selection of similar adaptive features in different groups of organisms but toward the same function: Sweet potato (root modification) and potato (stem modification) is another example for analogy. In the same line of argument, similarities in proteins and genes performing a given function among diverse organisms give clues to common ancestry.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION

 Another interesting observation supporting evolution by natural selection comes from England. In a collection of moths made in 1850s, i.e., before industrialisation set in, it was observed that there were more white-winged moths on trees than dark-winged or melanised moths. However, in the collection carried out from the same area, but after industrialisation, i.e., in 1920, there were more dark-winged moths in the same area, i.e., the proportion was reversed.

The explanation put forth for this observation was that ‘predators will spot a moth against a contrasting background’. During postindustrialisation period, the tree trunks became dark due to industrial smoke and soots. Under this condition the white-winged moth did not survive due to predators, dark-winged or melanised moth survived. Before industrialisation set in, thick growth of almost white-coloured lichen covered the trees - in that background the white winged moth survived but the dark-coloured moth were picked out by predators.  lichens can be used as industrial pollution indicators. They will not grow in areas that are polluted. Hence, moths that were able to camouflage themselves, i.e., hide in the background, survived (Figure 7.4). This understanding is supported by the fact that in areas where industrialisation did not occur e.g., in rural areas, the count of melanic moths was low. This showed that in a mixed population, those that can better-adapt, survive and increase in population size. Remember that no variant is completely wiped out. Similarly, excess use of herbicides, pesticides, etc., has only resulted in selection of resistant varieties in a much lesser time scale.

Evolution is not a directed process in the sense of determinism. It is a stochastic process based on chance events in nature and chance mutation in the organisms.

 WHAT IS ADAPTIVE RADIATION?

 

ADAPTIVE RADIATION

Small black birds later called Darwin’s Finches amazed him. He realised that there were many varieties of finches in the same island. All the varieties, he conjectured, evolved on the island itself. From the original seed-eating features, many other forms with altered beaks arose, enabling them to become insectivorous and vegetarian finches (Figure 7.5). This process of evolution of different species in a given geographical area starting from a point and literally radiating to other areas of geography (habitats) is called adaptive radiation.

Example: Darwin’s finches and Australian marsupials represent one of the best examples of ADAPTIVE RADIATION

 When more than one adaptive radiation appeared to have occurred in an isolated geographical area (representing different habitats), one can call this convergent evolution. Placental mammals in Australia also exhibit adaptive radiation in evolving into varieties of such placental mammals each of which appears to be ‘similar’ to a corresponding marsupial (e.g., Placental wolf and Tasmanian wolf-marsupial).

 BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION

 The essence of Darwinian theory about evolution is natural selection. The rate of appearance of new forms is

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

bilogy syllabus Class XI and XII